VMworld 2008 wrap-up – Part 1

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Thursday, September 25, 2008   |   10 Comments

This year’s VMware conference, VMworld 2008, broke all records with over 14,000 delegates and over 200 partners / competitors exhibiting.

As already written, understanding what really happened it’s impossible when looking at every single press announcement on its own.
There was a big need to collect all data, digest it, and try to figure out where the virtualization industry is going.


VMware is going away, on clouds.

As Micheal Keen, Mike Laverick, Massimo Re Ferrè and many other influencers have noted on their reports of the event, VMware pushed more than enough the cloud computing vision, clarifying that it wants a piece of the pie that Amazon has cooked and it’s eating all alone.

Of course, knowing that the company is working to drive the IT to the perfect world of the on-demand, ubiquitous computing it’s pleasing and exciting
A couple of years ago virtualization.info wrote that virtualization is just the first step of a long walk called grid computing.
We also published an article predicting that VMware would move on clouds as soon as Microsoft would step in the virtualization market with some concrete investments (and this because Microsoft wouldn’t be able to follow VMware on clouds for another ten years, giving the EMC subsidiary enough oxygen to stay ahead of the competition).

Nonetheless the message sounded very weak.

We need a vision. Made by human beings, the market ecosystem has to look forward and focus its energy on new technologies while selling/adopting the current ones.
In the past conferences, when VMware failed to tell its vision we complained and demanded for more. But there’s a limit: going too forward may confuse what is possible (and desirable) with what is just marketing hype-able.

In the Q&A session following his opening keynote, Maritz said that the company expect this future to concretize by a couple of years. From here it seems much farther away, like eight-ten years from now.

And looking at those 14,000 delegates we wonder how many of them were SMBs (let’s say 50% ?) and how many among those SMBs really care about embracing the cloud computing approach.

VMware is sure that SMBs will find such revolutionary architecture attractive because, at the first approach, it will offer them a cheap way to implement disaster recovery sites.
But we see a number of small companies still ignoring what capacity planning is, still struggling with P2V migrations, still figuring out if virtualization adoption really saves their money, etc.
More than that we see poor quality work done by many solutions providers that undermine the confidence in the technology and eventually drive the small firms back to the physical world.

Let’s skip the discussion about enterprises, where regulatory compliance and clouds can’t actually stand together in the same sentence (and hardly will do in the next two years).

In other words, if could computing is Virtualization 3.0 (as some over-zealous PR folks are already pitching), it seems that many companies are still at 0.9.


But let’s put aside for a minute any discussion about the feasibility of the vision and its go-to-mainstream timing.

This year’s VMworld was very special as the company:

  • has a brand new CEO
  • just lost both its co-founders (the CEO Diane Greene and the Chief Scientist Mendel Rosenblum)
  • is losing some key executives
  • is facing a much negative performance at Wall Street
  • is facing harsh competition (perceived or real it doesn’t matter) from Microsoft

In such impressive conjunction of events, one would expect the new CEO Paul Maritz coming on stage and telling to the company’s customers who he is, why he’s the right person to lead the company and that, at least, he has a solid plan for the next couple of quarters.

It’s early indeed: he took the new position just two months and a half ago, but not even a mention about the upcoming strategy?
Maritz repeated 35 times the word cloud (as somebody was picky enough to note) and couldn’t even spend a single sentence on how he plans to solve the problems that his company has today.

After his keynote VMW stock value had a significant drop. Is it legit to wonder why?

PostVMworld_VMW


Luckily, the engine behind so many impalpable clouds is ESX, and the ESX 4.0 sneak preview that Steve Herrod, CTO, showed on stage was both concrete and thrilling.

With this upcoming release, VMware will demonstrate more than ever how virtualization is an amazing tool that can transform every segment of the IT.

If a company can afford the price (and this is the only point of the whole question, since ever), then VMware Fault Tolerance (formerly continuous availability), VMsafe, AppSpeed, Virtual Distributed Networking, and a number of additional features that stay unveiled for now, will introduce some serious innovation in its data center.

Some of these things may be still in early stage: as Rich Miller and Christopher Hoff promptly noted, the security ecosystem was surprisingly silent during VMworld around VMsafe, and Cisco couldn’t even announce the beta of its upcoming virtual switch for the Virtual Distributed Networking.
But even delivering in mid-2009, the VMware’s competition seems so far away right now.

Unfortunately this has a downside: the more VI 4 shines on stage, the more concerns it raises on the exhibit floor where 206 partners are telling stories about synergy and integration.

vCenter 4.0 (formerly VirtualCenter) is about to include a series of new modules that cover pretty much every need in the virtualization space, from chargeback to orchestration.
Every company that is trying to add value on top of the VMware management layer, may soon have a hard time to justify its existence.

Of course VMware reassures the partners promising flexible APIs and a friendly, cooperative go-to-market strategy, but the partners still remember the terrible experience with VDI in 2007, when the company first fed and promoted a healthy ecosystem and then killed it by acquiring one of the players (Propero).

On stage Steve Herrod basically previewed how VMware is about to invade all the spaces, and it’s hard to believe that a customer would prefer dealing with two vendors (which implies different licensing and support agreements) when it can have all the features he needs from the market incumbent.

So now the partners basically have two choices: stay loyal to VMware and focus their R&D investment on vCenter, in the only hope that they will develop some groundbreaking capability worthwhile of an acquisition, or re-tune their efforts for a more cross-platform strategy, where Microsoft (and the lack of features of Hyper-V and SCVMM) suddenly appears more attractive than ever.

Easily to guess, over the long term every vendor would look at Microsoft platform with interest. But nobody has unlimited resources to invest in development.
A vCenter that does everything just facilitates all those partnership deals with Microsoft that could be postponed by a year or two.


Relevant VMware press announcements:


In the second part of this wrap-up we’ll see where the rest of the virtualization industry is going while VMware is headed to the clouds.

10 Comments

Anonymous Massimo Re Ferre' Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:56:00 PM  
Alessandro,

you make good points on the dilemma of moving forward with the features Vs leveraging the partners. I have been thinking about this too in the last few months since I have been exposed to some of the news.

I think they have two choices: they stay still and just wait for the competition to catch up or they keep moving forward and kill their partners. This is a challenging dilemma for many.

On the other hand MS has had the same problem since the launch of Windows in the early eighties. As you know the MS products catalog has changed (a bit) since but they were able to still become a reference architecture for their partners to target.

It's like walking a border line though. Perhaps, after all, VMware has to learn something from MS? ;-)

Massimo.
Anonymous Anonymous Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:37:00 PM  
This is a very thorough article and spot on. I believe that you are right that Paul Maritz needs to do more to address the current direction of VMware. Also, I think there needs to be more of a push to explain his leadership organization with all the changes.
Anonymous Anonymous Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:39:00 PM  
I would like to see an article about the pros and cons of suggestions and alternatives for SMBs in light of VMware being considered too expensive for many SMBs and MS perhaps not offering enough desired features or being too new in virtualization. Thank you, Tom
Anonymous Anonymous Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:17:00 PM  
I think you may be a little overalarmed regarding the partners choices. The first version (or 2 in some cases) of vapps, vServices, etc, will probably be pretty basic and limited compared to what the partners offer. It took them 3-4 years to get a good p2V tool and they still do not have a real useful perf data tool. So I think some partners will be more challenged than others as VMware begins to "eat" their partners and occupy their ecosystems... Good Article!
Anonymous Jason Langone Friday, September 26, 2008 2:41:00 AM  
Fantastic wrap up, Alessandro.

I've been a firm believer in "cloud computing in a virtualized atmosphere" for some time, and am personally glad to see it mentioned so much at VMWorld last week. However, I would have appreciated more of a discussion on the actual plan on getting to the cloud mecca. Instead, its existence was just an underlying allusion.

The presence of Elastra, 3Tera, et al. certainly was noted and it's great to see them at VMWorld. However, I don't think any of them are using ESX as their magical ether for their production clouds (maybe I'm mistaken?).

I also think it's interesting to see VMware produce or acquire the full suite including charge back, process management, et cetera. If I was a third-party vendor I'd want to have a show stopper up my sleeve or make sure my product works with every virtualization platform out there. I found it a bit nauseating how many monitoring solutions where out there. In my opinion, they all roughly do 90% the same thing, and if you're going to do the same thing the GUI better be Ferrari-attractive to look at (e.g. vFoglight) or that 10% needs to include a strong differentiator. Search capabilities seemed to be popular this year.

I was very excited to see the new iteration of B-hive, vAppSeed. I've been pushing B-hive like crack as I think it's a fantastic product and we've had some great success using it on engagements. Seeing it integrating into Virtual Center was one of the top highlights of the Solutions Exchange for me.

It will be interesting to see what they show off at VMWorld Europe in February - hopefully there's more tangible evidence of the VMware-based cloud initiative; it's what I'm pining after.

Cheers,

- Jason Langone
Anonymous Jason Boche Friday, September 26, 2008 7:05:00 AM  
Very nice article by virtualization.info. It was stated long ago by many that the future of virtualization is not about the hypervisor, but rather the infrastructure management tools. We are just about there today. It will soon be survival of the fittest for all players in the game. If I were a partner, I'd be looking to showcase my tools to Microsoft. Microsoft is a vendor that often uses its fortune to buy its way into technology it did not have the talent or the time to develop itself (especially when Microsoft is late to the game and has to play "catch up", major advancements can be had in a single transaction): DOS, Connectix/Virtual PC/Virtual Server, what will be next to compliment Microsoft's virtualization solution?
Anonymous A. Candelaria Friday, September 26, 2008 7:57:00 AM  
Let us all remember that partnering with Microsoft is as dangerous, if not more dangerous, than parterning with VMware. Microsoft has a history of including functionality in its Operating System that had previously been provided by a flourishing partner community. The oldest example that comes to mind is Stacker. Going forward from there, we have the destruction of the TCP/IP provider market when it was included in Win95. They destoyed Procomm when it was included in Windows as well. Internet Explorer's inclusion triggered an anti-trust lawsuit. Now they are trying to include anti-virus and firewall utilities in the OS. I think the main difference here is that Microsoft tends to bundle products and services into it's Operating System itself with no option for seperation. VMware is at least tiering it's offerings and seperating out it's product suite so you are not forced to purchase the total VMware solution.
Anonymous Jay Rogers Friday, September 26, 2008 3:28:00 PM  
You probably are now wise to use the stock market as a "gauge" on if people liked what was said at VMworld or if they are concerned about staff changes. With all the market problems instability the last year and especially now, there are many stocks not doing well.

As a product grows in scope and direction (like VMware and virtualization) there will be toes stepped on (partners that have competing products). But I agree with an earlier comment. VMware is making API's available so these and other partners can still access and compete with their products against the VMware products. If you were a partner with Microsoft, they would totally put you out of business by claiming in needed to be in their OS..end of story.
Anonymous Fred Peterson Friday, September 26, 2008 11:18:00 PM  
I disagree about using the stock market as a gauge Jay, at least right now. Too much is going on right now in the market that attempting to judge what people thought of VMWare at a time when everyone is focused on the financial health of the entire country is not a good idea. Ask me again in 9-12 months though.

Ultimately if a companies fundamentals and profitability are true to forecast that will be reflected in the stock price...but after the turmoil of just the last couple months within VMWare coupled with the general market sentiment?
Anonymous Anonymous Monday, September 29, 2008 8:37:00 PM  
"Going forward from there, we have the destruction of the TCP/IP provider market when it was included in Win95."

OMG. Microsoft added TCP/IP to its OS. Call out the police!

Dumb example.

" I think the main difference here is that Microsoft tends to bundle products and services into it's Operating System itself with no option for seperation."

They add features to their OS. Just like any other OS supplier does.

Add New Comment