VMware is no more the only player in town

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Friday, September 05, 2008   |   5 Comments

There’s no doubt that VMware is still the top virtualization player, but the upcoming Q4 2008 will highlight in a crystal clear way that it’s no more the only player available.

The landscape is being reshaped by several major vendors trying to erode the VMware leadership with different strategies:

5 Comments

Anonymous VirtualLab Friday, September 05, 2008 4:14:00 PM  
Seems to me like Microsoft is going to be the toughest competitor here. They own the desktop stack today and its going to be real hard for other infrastructure vendors to win the battle. A few tweaks here and there and now Vista/XP run fastest on Hyper-V. Pull a few hundred mill from the Windows business unit and subsidize the "free" hypervisor. Not many others out there who can match them on these fronts.

The focus on the hypervisor as the only thing that matters for VDI is getting a little old. It's not just about the Hypervisor. Some interesting points about the Microsoft roadmap and the future of VDI were made over at virtual strategy in an interview with the vdiworks guys. Hearing the roadmap stuff they talk about, its clear to me that we are only at a very initial stage in virtual desktop development.

The link is http://www.virtualization.info/2008/09/vmware-is-no-more-only-player-in-town.html#comments
Anonymous Anonymous Friday, September 05, 2008 5:29:00 PM  
Article is spot on. There are numerous very good virtualization offerings available and the price to get started have mostly (yeah, I'm looking at you VMware) dropped dramatically. Besides, the interesting work is happening in systems management.
Anonymous Anonymous Saturday, September 06, 2008 5:06:00 PM  
It's VMware, Microsoft, and everyone else is just noise.
Anonymous Hans Vredevoort Sunday, September 07, 2008 1:55:00 PM  
Of course (previous poster)! Just stick your head in the sand.
Anonymous Anonymous Sunday, September 07, 2008 8:43:00 PM  
I agree, Citrix doesn't care about Server Virtualization... they just bought it for VDI. Novell is always 5 steps behind. Red Hat, well I would chose Virtual Iron above RedHat... Sun, do they still exist?

MS + VMware and VirtualIron for the real SMB market. that's it.

Add New Comment