Microsoft to release Hyper-V with almost no Windows, rivaling with VMware ESXi

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Monday, September 08, 2008   |   9 Comments

With a big event in Bellvue, Microsoft officially presents today its new hypervisor, Hyper-V 1.0, released in late June.

To celebrate Microsoft has a big surprise: a new version of the hypervisor, Hyper-V Server 2008, made to compete with VMware ESXi.

The existing versions of Hyper-V loads into its parent partition a full copy of Windows Server 2008 or the lightweight Windows Server 2008 Server Core edition.

The new product that the company is announcing today loads in the parent partition even less than Server Core: Microsoft developed a minimal version of Windows which only includes the OS Kernel, its driver model and little more (it’s not clear yet how much more).

This implies that the Microsoft virtualization platform is even less oversized by Windows, an aspect of the product heavily criticized by VMware.

The other versions of Hyper-V allows one, four or unlimited virtual machines, depending on the Windows Server 2008 version loaded into the parent partition. But what happens with Hyper-V Server 2008?
The minimal version of Windows included in this release doesn’t allow any virtual machine, so customer will have to buy a license for each guest OS they want to use (up to 128).

While this solutions seems strange, Microsoft went for it to serve all the companies that want to adopt Microsoft virtualization but don’t want to invest in Windows Server 2008.
Those customers will be able to move their existing Windows Server 2003 OSes into the Hyper-V Server 2008 virtual machines, without paying any additional license fee.

According to that, Microsoft will release this new product free of charge, within 30 days.

This new product will be supported by the upcoming System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008, to be released within 30 days as well.

Labels:

9 Comments

Anonymous Anonymous Monday, September 08, 2008 5:47:00 PM  
As far as licensing, couldn't you still purchase an enterprise or datacenter license for the server without applying the OS? It will be interesting to see the EULA on this.
Anonymous Anonymous Monday, September 08, 2008 7:37:00 PM  
or just use VMware ...
Anonymous Paul Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:28:00 AM  
They promised a Hypervisor only solution for $28 during the early Hyper-V announcements (Today they just offer 2008 with and without Hyper-V for anti competitive reasons but don't offer it on its own). So, I guess this is the $28 Hyper-V only version that was originally promised.

Believe that this version won't support "Quick Migration" as that relies on Cluster Services which won't be part of this stripped down build. To run "Quick Migration", you will need to purchase the full version of 2008 for the parent partition.

Hyper-V's footprint is 2.6 GB today. They may be able to reduce it some, however given their architecture, I can't believe they will get anywhere close to ESXi's 32Meg.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:11:00 AM  
Paul, ESX3i needs a local drive as scratch space or a connection to a SAN.

Microsoft is aiming at small shops at first. Most likely they won't be using a SAN -- they will use local storage.

Who will notice a couple of GB used for the OS even if all the server has is an 80GB drive. And when SATA drives are 100$ for 500GB, its not important.
Anonymous Paul Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:27:00 PM  
Anon,

Issue for us is not so much about the cost of the HD. As you pointed out, that is not a huge cost.

The main point is one of attack and patching surface. With more code, statistically you increase your attack and patching surface.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:37:00 PM  
Paul - Different Anon here...
The installed size and attack surface are different things. The ESXi installed size isn't 32MB - it's about 1GB. This is because it needs to supply the tools .ISO's among other things.
In a well managed and secured environment, the hypervisor attack surface isn't my top priority -reliability and functionality are far more important.

Don't buy into the FUD from any vendor - search the facts out for yourself.
Anonymous Jason Boche Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:08:00 PM  
Innovation is at the top of my selection toolkit, but not at the expense of security or stability. At the end of the day, so long as we have reasonable security and excellent uptime in the datacenter, the innovation is what excites me most because that is what typically translates into automation, efficiency, and ultimately TCO savings.
Anonymous Anonymous Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:11:00 AM  
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous Anonymous Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:45:00 AM  
Does Hyper-V support 6 core processors?

Add New Comment