Mendel Rosenblum, Co-Founder and Chief Scientist at VMware, resigns

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Tuesday, September 09, 2008   |   17 Comments

virtualization.info just received a confirmation from a trusted source: VMware co-founder and Chief Scientist Mendel Rosenblum resigned.

His wife, Diane Greene, that founded the company with him and led it as CEO since 1998 was removed by the board of directors in July for much unclear reasons. After that, the risk that her husband would follow was very high.

VMware told virtualization.info that Rosenblum took a month of vacation immediately after that meeting, and this delayed the decision to leave the company.

Also, maybe fearing an impact on the upcoming VMworld 2008 in Las Vegas, VMware may have requested to postpone the resignation until the event registration was almost complete: this year VMworld achieved a ground-breaking record of 14,000 delegates so there’s no more need to wait.

While Diane Green was the keeper of the VMware culture and engineering tradition, Rosenblum was recognized as the company visionary, designing technologies to be implemented in the next few years.
For example, the upcoming security APIs called VMsafe, which has the potential to change the way we secure the data centers, were developed by the scientist in 2002.

virtualization.info was told that Rosenblum will go back working full-time to the university where he and his wife started VMware: Stanford.

With him VMware has already lost three key leaders.
The third one is the Executve Vice President of R&D, Richard Sarwal, who left just last week to go back to Oracle. Now it seems clear why.

This departure comes at the worst moment: yesterday Microsoft officially presented its competing product, Hyper-V, and while the hypervisor is still years behind the VMware technology, the entire industry announced support for it.
VMware will need a solid strategy to counter that: cutting-edge technologies rarely wins against Microsoft marketing war-machines and ubiquitous alliances.


Update: The New York Times reports that also Paul Chan, Vice President of Product Development will leave the company next month, after resigning in August.


Second update: After the news VMware lost almost 7% at Wall Street today:

Mendel

17 Comments

Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:43:00 AM  
Sad to hear, but i think it was only a matter of time.

I'm curious if, and by whom he can be replaced.
Blogger larstr Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:02:00 PM  
Go back? Rosenblum has been at Stanford all the time. But now he's probably back full time again.

Lars
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:24:00 PM  
How many VMware people are going to be snapped up by Red Hat??
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:24:00 PM  
It isn't technology that will keep VMware in the DC. It is major investments customers have that are hard to change, known performance (uptime and SLAs matter more than tech) and the fact that many customers are sick of Microsoft owning the control point for all they do (which places inherent limits on business agility). Give it 2 - 3 years before the panic button is pressed because there is no real competition in this space yet. If VMware goes down it will be because a bunch of people have just accepted the fact that Microsoft will win every time. That is a sad day for businesses everywhere.
Anonymous Tim FitzGerald Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:56:00 PM  
Wow! As always you are on the pulse of the virtualization market.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 5:50:00 PM  
" That is a sad day for businesses everywhere"

Actually, for price concious businesses, this is a great day.

When VMware got started, spending 30,000 on a server was not unusual.

If it cost 10,000 for VMware, it was a good deal.

Now I can buy dual-core servers for 399$ and quad-core for 1,000$.

Why virtualize a 399$ box if it costs a lot more?

Cheap Hyper-V and other products are the way to go.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 6:20:00 PM  
All VMware has to do is stop overcharging for Virtual Center, but they need that $$$$ to pay all the engineers to whom they offered $150k+ salaries last year and this year.

I don't understand why VMware makes so many blunders vis-a-vis the SMB market.

I think no one really understands the SMB market and people are trying to charge as much as possible and give as little as possible.

The first company that stops charging exorbitant $$$$ for HA will be the winner.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:35:00 PM  
$399 for a dual-core server? Please stay well away from my data center.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:54:00 PM  
"$399 for a dual-core server? Please stay well away from my data cente"

I will. Its probably full of $10,000 servers.

But a small business might buy a T105 from Dell for 379$.

http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=bedwv3f&c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04&kc=features~featured_server
Anonymous Massimo Re Ferre' Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:17:00 PM  
>Now I can buy dual-core servers for 399$ and quad-core for 1,000$.

>Why virtualize a 399$ box if it costs a lot more?

For the very simple reason that if you have 1000 applications and you end up using 1000 x 399$ servers.... it will cost you, approx, 2.3 Trillion dollars to manage them, to create HA, to build a DR plan etc etc

Sure if you are looking a server to put under the desk of a dentist than... virtualization isn't for you.

Massimo.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:47:00 PM  
Massimo,

I think the point is that companies with 1000 servers will probably buy VMware and spend millions of dollars to do so.

SMB will not need VMware features or license costs or the specialized hardware.

Hyper-V uses pretty standard Windows drivers therefore.

They could choose to buy 10 x 379$ boxes fo 10 apps.

Or 1 $4,000 box with 16GB to run those 10 apps using Hyper-V. (Dell 2900 with 2x-quads)

But they won't pay VMware another 4000-6000 for VI.
Anonymous Anonymous Wednesday, September 10, 2008 1:02:00 AM  
Let's just do a hypothetical here. MS convinces EMC to covertly destroy the competition by forcing out the founders who brought vision and culture to drive the company. Then you bring an "ex" microsoft ringer...
Anonymous titomane Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:31:00 PM  
i agree with massimo, you can't speak about VI prices (which imply a least a good NAS) and hyperV. You can buy ESX starter as a stand alone and it's not 5000$ !
Anonymous Anonymous Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:53:00 PM  
In my view as of today VMware became a commodity...it will struggle to be the technology that has constantly got the industry buzzing through Mr Rosenbaulms awe inspiring foresight into the future of computing and the r and d on the grass roots computer science that has made ESX the product it is today starting with the Hypervisor, then onto Vmotion/DRS/HA etc and then into SOI with Software appliances and Vsafe (yet to be seen)

Its pull your socks up time for Vmware now, they either buy talent or grow it to survive...
Anonymous Anonymous Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:02:00 PM  
Dave Marley for CEO
Anonymous Anonymous Friday, September 12, 2008 7:23:00 AM  
A sad event indeed, but he leaves with a roadmap of technology at VMware for at least the next two years and it is up the broader VMware team to build on those ideas and turn them into commercial realities.
Anonymous Anonymous Friday, September 26, 2008 2:15:00 PM  
This is a major loss for VMW. As an ex-employee myself, he was truly the brains behind the company in the R&D dept. He is not a resource that can be replaced at VMW. Diane should have been replaced earlier, but Mendel was the lifeblood of VMW.

Add New Comment