Live from VMworld 2008: Day 1 – VMware Keynote

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Tuesday, September 16, 2008   |   21 Comments

As usual, virtualization.info will provide a live coverage of the opening keynotes at VMworld.

The brand new VMware CEO, Paul Maritz, is on stage.

He starts with a short recap of the IT history, and of the VMware story, mentioning both Diane Greene and Mendel Rosenblum, both out of the company, for their contribution (surprisingly, no applause from the audience).

To describe the evolution of VMware products over the last 10 years the slides show three branches that,  somewhere after 2008, will merge into a single thing.

Maritz introduces the three technology domains that VMware sees matching those three branches to become one: the Virtual Datacenter OS (VDC-OS), the vCloud and the vClient.

To justify the need for a new software platform that is elastic, self-managing and self-healing, Maritz points out the impossibility to provision in a proper and prompt way the application workloads depending on the business needs.

The upcoming VMware’s VDC-OS depends on physical hardware capabilities (vCompute), Intel FlexMigration is mentioned, on virtual hardware extensibility (vNetwork), Cisco virtual switches are mentioned (we’ll cover the Cisco keynote later today), on storage availability and reliability (vStorage).

The Virtual Datacenter OS is made to run workloads of course, and Maritz describes how the company is moving from the Virtual Appliances to the vApps, an evolution of the pre-configured VMs that we have today, able to match security, manageability and availability requirements more easily.

The Virtual Datacenter OS and its vApps must be managed, so Maritz introduces the vManagement concept: an extensible management framework where 3rd party vendors (BMC, CA, IBM, etc.) can plug into to add value on top of Virtual Center.


Now VMware’s CEO move on the vCloud concept. He announces that over 100 service providers (including BT, Verizon, Sunguard and T-Systems) are working with the company to deploy federated vApps.

Demo time: a system administrator downloads a virtual appliance (vApp in the future) from the VMware Marketplace and defines a business policy for it before deploying: the SLA must be less than 4 seconds, if the condition is not satisfied then a cloud for that application must be built on the fly to address the workload demand in a transparent way.
The virtual appliance is loaded and put on heavy pressure until it surpass the SLA threshold. At that point the VMware Infrastructure spawns new instances of it to recover the performance level required.


Last part of the Maritz story: the vClient.

The company is working to move from the concept of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) to a new thing called VMware View.

In desktop environments the end user experience and productivity is the key so VMware is working on something to define the OS, the applications and the storage of a desktop environment as user properties. These properties follow the user on any physical platform he uses (a thin client, a standard PC, a mobile device, etc.).

Demo time: an end user plugs a USB key into a laptop which boots the operating system inside it (it seems a Linux distribution). The minimal OS just launches a Virtual Desktop Manager client to reach a virtual workstation somewhere in the VMware Infrastructure.
Once there, the end user is welcome to launch a 3D game and enjoy a smooth rendering.


The visionary keynote is almost finished.
Maritz could just touch the fascinating, epic and extremely complex vision that VMware wants to realize. But what he presented is enough to reveal a profound fracture between his company and the current competitors: never like today VMware seems far, far away from the small business market and fully committed just to the highest-end of the enterprise segment.

Just to summarize: VMware is moving the current hardware, including servers, workstations and storage, to the cloud.
virtualization.info is suggesting that VMware would start moving to cloud computing as soon as Microsoft would enter the market for serious competition. Here we go now.

Now the question really is if the market is ready to follow.
For now the answer in not exactly positive:

VMW_VMworld2008


The session is finished but virtualization.info will also cover some of the other sponsors keynotes (Cisco is one of them) due today.
Additionally, we’ll provide the coverage for tomorrow’s keynote, performed by Steve Herrod, CTO at VMware, and for the Paul Maritz Q&A session.

Stay with us!

21 Comments

Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:15:00 AM  
The time difference on the East Coast is only 3 hours, we hope you will post something before long...thank you!! :)
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:11:00 AM  
Wow, your blog takes it to the next level. I could not go to VMWorld so I am really looking forward to your blogs and analysis of the announcements. You rock.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:24:00 AM  
Open comment to VMware. Nice job screwing the channel. I work for a company that develops orchestration software for ESX. Today my company was TOTALLY blindsided by the fact that VMware is developing this. Our partner manager has been telling us what "value" we provide the VMware ecosystem.

Bull%^&*.

In addition, we spoke with storage partners who echoed this sentiment. VMware is now delivering thin provisioning too?

"Partners" beware.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:03:00 AM  
I'm hearing rumors of VMware layoffs here at VMworld. Was that announced today?
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 2:36:00 PM  
I don't see any reporting here.
It must only be for VIPs or paying customers or something.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 5:27:00 PM  
"I work for a company that develops orchestration software for ESX.Today my company was TOTALLY blindsided by the fact that VMware is developing this."

In September 2007, the Company acquired Dunes Technologies, which provides IT process orchestration software for virtual environments.

Have you guys been asleep for a year?
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 5:36:00 PM  
VM are still hiring - just checked job openings page!!
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:32:00 PM  
Thank you for the update. Nice summary. Mmakes it easier to parse all the news articles. Good to know for sure now that VMware really doesn't care about the SMB market. Means we will look at Hyper-V, XenServer, etc.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:52:00 PM  
The stock price is not in anyway shape or form a good way to determine whether the market agrees and follows suit, especially right now.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:05:00 PM  
I can understand the vision of the company as they want to push it to another level, but I will be greatly disapointed if this is done by putting aside SMBs. They were the first real player to release a production platform affordable for SMB (I mean free!) and than attract them to a much more complete infrastructure.

We'll see.....
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:24:00 PM  
Why are other vendors better for SMBs?

ESXi is free, VMware Server is free, VirtualCenter Foundation is affordable (especially with an acceleration kit).
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:04:00 PM  
Foundation doesn't include Vmotion, which only comes in the expensive Standard/Enterprise version. SMBs need good features just as much as Fortune 1000 companies.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:50:00 PM  
What would make SMB's happy? To give it all away for free? Then, how would VMware make money and what would that do to the share price?

Reality is that VMware needs to make money in order to innovate and provide the functions that then pressure others (Microsoft) to follow suite. Unfortunately where they are going to make money is not in the areas that SMBs are prepared to pay. Does it mean that they don't care about SMBs? No. If they didn't, then they wouldn't have given away ESXi for free. Also, I think SMBs will benefit in the form of new features from the ESX 4 announcements tomorrow some of which you would assume would be rolled into the free version.
Blogger Broeken Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:16:00 PM  
for the smb market there are plenty of "cheap" options to choose from, don't think you will get high-end hard/soft-ware for smb prices ? or am i wrong ?
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:30:00 PM  
Would you expect VMW to start giving everything for free? Last I heard, their employees need food, have family and have mortgages to pay.

If SMBs care so much about free stuff, why aren't they ditching MSFT products (Windows, Exchange, SQL, Sharepoint...) for free OpenSource products? I just don't believe that SMBs are not ready to pay for good products. But VMW critics seems to believe that for some reason.
Anonymous Anonymous Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:34:00 PM  
Hyper V doesn't even have the features that cost extra with ESX, so you can't even compare them. In 2 years time when Hyper V is equipped with vmotion, who knows what that will cost. About Xen, I don't know enough to comment.
Anonymous Anonymous Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:03:00 AM  
[quote]Foundation doesn't include Vmotion, which only comes in the expensive Standard/Enterprise version. SMBs need good features just as much as Fortune 1000 companies.[/quote]

Agreed but you can purchase vMotion and add it to the foundation kit. Hyper V doesn't have this feature and you must purchase Server 2008 Enterprise edition for Live Migration to work. So let's compare:

3 - Windows Server 2008 Enterprise w/ HyperV ($3,699.99 ea for total of $11099.97.)

1 - Foundation of ESX = $3,624.00
3 - vMotion Licenses = $12,072
Total Price = $15,696

(Prices from CDW and VMware Web Site)

I do get 1 year of 12x5 support from VMware, Microsoft comes with 90 days. There are ways to make each of these go down. So yeah, VMware is still more expensive but they have done things to make this better. I suspect that when 2010 rolls around and Live Migration is actually "live" that vMotion will be cheaper and more of a commodity product because Fault Tolerance will be the be the big rage.

DJ
Anonymous Anonymous Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:16:00 AM  
For the SME market XenServer5 is a real alternative to VMware, with a simple host based licensing model there is no distinction between a 2way/4way or 8way servers, true scale up architecture of your hardware can be leveraged without incurring additional license costs.

3x XenServer5 Enterprise $9,900
3x 10x5 Support/Maint -1 Yr $3,500
TotalCost $13,400

With XenServer5 Enterprise you get High Availability and XenMotion, management is free with XenCenter included in all versions, no need for additional licenses to manage your virtual infrastructure. It’s that simple no more to spend. www.xenserver5.com

XenServer5 is fully certified by Microsoft.
Anonymous Anonymous Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:09:00 PM  
For me it is really hard to understand why worse products are better. Why worse technology is better. Why lack of innovation is a plus. Why doing things in a complex way is better than doing them in an easy way. Why taking more time to do a thing is more efficient than doing it in less time. Why taking more resources to accomplish a thing is better than using less resources.
At the end of the day this kind of thinking can only come from competitors that have economic interests on it (understandable atttitude), or from those whose capacity to learn new things, adapt to change, and willing to improve were killed by their comfort zone and therefore the only way they have to survive or make their colleagues think their "knowledge" is still valuable is trying to stop the world going forward.
The problem for the lattest is that the world has already gone forward.
Anonymous Fabio Brizzolla Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:04:00 PM  
SMBs want some BC features too... I think VMware just need to think about free its HA for ESXi... just that and done.

Maybe in the next 3~5 years load balancing turns a commodity too while ESX4.x's features list grows up.

Who knows.
Anonymous Roberto Boclin Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:29:00 PM  
Why i need two support contracts, one for VMware and other for Microsoft?

With Microsoft and Citrix new agreement, i need only Microsoft support contract for virtualization and my all services and management activities.

VMware will be more two years of the market share only.

Add New Comment