Live from VMworld 2008: Day 1 – VMware Keynote
As usual, virtualization.info will provide a live coverage of the opening keynotes at VMworld.
The brand new VMware CEO, Paul Maritz, is on stage.
He starts with a short recap of the IT history, and of the VMware story, mentioning both Diane Greene and Mendel Rosenblum, both out of the company, for their contribution (surprisingly, no applause from the audience).
To describe the evolution of VMware products over the last 10 years the slides show three branches that, somewhere after 2008, will merge into a single thing.
Maritz introduces the three technology domains that VMware sees matching those three branches to become one: the Virtual Datacenter OS (VDC-OS), the vCloud and the vClient.
To justify the need for a new software platform that is elastic, self-managing and self-healing, Maritz points out the impossibility to provision in a proper and prompt way the application workloads depending on the business needs.
The upcoming VMware’s VDC-OS depends on physical hardware capabilities (vCompute), Intel FlexMigration is mentioned, on virtual hardware extensibility (vNetwork), Cisco virtual switches are mentioned (we’ll cover the Cisco keynote later today), on storage availability and reliability (vStorage).
The Virtual Datacenter OS is made to run workloads of course, and Maritz describes how the company is moving from the Virtual Appliances to the vApps, an evolution of the pre-configured VMs that we have today, able to match security, manageability and availability requirements more easily.
The Virtual Datacenter OS and its vApps must be managed, so Maritz introduces the vManagement concept: an extensible management framework where 3rd party vendors (BMC, CA, IBM, etc.) can plug into to add value on top of Virtual Center.
Now VMware’s CEO move on the vCloud concept. He announces that over 100 service providers (including BT, Verizon, Sunguard and T-Systems) are working with the company to deploy federated vApps.
Demo time: a system administrator downloads a virtual appliance (vApp in the future) from the VMware Marketplace and defines a business policy for it before deploying: the SLA must be less than 4 seconds, if the condition is not satisfied then a cloud for that application must be built on the fly to address the workload demand in a transparent way.
The virtual appliance is loaded and put on heavy pressure until it surpass the SLA threshold. At that point the VMware Infrastructure spawns new instances of it to recover the performance level required.
Last part of the Maritz story: the vClient.
The company is working to move from the concept of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) to a new thing called VMware View.
In desktop environments the end user experience and productivity is the key so VMware is working on something to define the OS, the applications and the storage of a desktop environment as user properties. These properties follow the user on any physical platform he uses (a thin client, a standard PC, a mobile device, etc.).
Demo time: an end user plugs a USB key into a laptop which boots the operating system inside it (it seems a Linux distribution). The minimal OS just launches a Virtual Desktop Manager client to reach a virtual workstation somewhere in the VMware Infrastructure.
Once there, the end user is welcome to launch a 3D game and enjoy a smooth rendering.
The visionary keynote is almost finished.
Maritz could just touch the fascinating, epic and extremely complex vision that VMware wants to realize. But what he presented is enough to reveal a profound fracture between his company and the current competitors: never like today VMware seems far, far away from the small business market and fully committed just to the highest-end of the enterprise segment.
Just to summarize: VMware is moving the current hardware, including servers, workstations and storage, to the cloud.
virtualization.info is suggesting that VMware would start moving to cloud computing as soon as Microsoft would enter the market for serious competition. Here we go now.
Now the question really is if the market is ready to follow.
For now the answer in not exactly positive:
The session is finished but virtualization.info will also cover some of the other sponsors keynotes (Cisco is one of them) due today.
Additionally, we’ll provide the coverage for tomorrow’s keynote, performed by Steve Herrod, CTO at VMware, and for the Paul Maritz Q&A session.
Stay with us!
21 Comments
Anonymous
Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:15:00 AM
Bull%^&*.
In addition, we spoke with storage partners who echoed this sentiment. VMware is now delivering thin provisioning too?
"Partners" beware.
It must only be for VIPs or paying customers or something.
In September 2007, the Company acquired Dunes Technologies, which provides IT process orchestration software for virtual environments.
Have you guys been asleep for a year?
We'll see.....
ESXi is free, VMware Server is free, VirtualCenter Foundation is affordable (especially with an acceleration kit).
Reality is that VMware needs to make money in order to innovate and provide the functions that then pressure others (Microsoft) to follow suite. Unfortunately where they are going to make money is not in the areas that SMBs are prepared to pay. Does it mean that they don't care about SMBs? No. If they didn't, then they wouldn't have given away ESXi for free. Also, I think SMBs will benefit in the form of new features from the ESX 4 announcements tomorrow some of which you would assume would be rolled into the free version.
If SMBs care so much about free stuff, why aren't they ditching MSFT products (Windows, Exchange, SQL, Sharepoint...) for free OpenSource products? I just don't believe that SMBs are not ready to pay for good products. But VMW critics seems to believe that for some reason.
Agreed but you can purchase vMotion and add it to the foundation kit. Hyper V doesn't have this feature and you must purchase Server 2008 Enterprise edition for Live Migration to work. So let's compare:
3 - Windows Server 2008 Enterprise w/ HyperV ($3,699.99 ea for total of $11099.97.)
1 - Foundation of ESX = $3,624.00
3 - vMotion Licenses = $12,072
Total Price = $15,696
(Prices from CDW and VMware Web Site)
I do get 1 year of 12x5 support from VMware, Microsoft comes with 90 days. There are ways to make each of these go down. So yeah, VMware is still more expensive but they have done things to make this better. I suspect that when 2010 rolls around and Live Migration is actually "live" that vMotion will be cheaper and more of a commodity product because Fault Tolerance will be the be the big rage.
DJ
3x XenServer5 Enterprise $9,900
3x 10x5 Support/Maint -1 Yr $3,500
TotalCost $13,400
With XenServer5 Enterprise you get High Availability and XenMotion, management is free with XenCenter included in all versions, no need for additional licenses to manage your virtual infrastructure. It’s that simple no more to spend. www.xenserver5.com
XenServer5 is fully certified by Microsoft.
At the end of the day this kind of thinking can only come from competitors that have economic interests on it (understandable atttitude), or from those whose capacity to learn new things, adapt to change, and willing to improve were killed by their comfort zone and therefore the only way they have to survive or make their colleagues think their "knowledge" is still valuable is trying to stop the world going forward.
The problem for the lattest is that the world has already gone forward.
Maybe in the next 3~5 years load balancing turns a commodity too while ESX4.x's features list grows up.
Who knows.
With Microsoft and Citrix new agreement, i need only Microsoft support contract for virtualization and my all services and management activities.
VMware will be more two years of the market share only.
Add New Comment
Copyright © 2003-2009 virtualization.info. All rights reserved.
virtualization.info Network: virtualization.info | virtualization.tv | Virtualization Congress





