Parallels enters VDI market with Quest/Provision Networks OEM agreement

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Tuesday, June 24, 2008   |   3 Comments

Parallels announces today a major agreement to offer a VDI solution powered by Quest/Provision Networks Virtual Access Suite (VAS).

The deal involves Virtuozzo Containers, the Parallels OS virtualization solution, and not the upcoming hardware virtualization platform Parallels Server.
Considering the strong presence on Virtuozzo in the hosting industry it's easy to imagine how Parallels is working to offer a rentable VDI mode like the one that Desktone is trying to market.

The use of OS virtualization as back-end infrastructure implies a minor overhead and a higher consolidation ratio: Parallels and Quest report something like 130/140 virtual desktops per host rather than 30/60 in VDI scenarios with hardware virtualization platforms.

The solution is priced $140 per concurrent desktop connection and it's available now through sales channel of both companies.

On its side Provision Networks, even after the Quest acquisition, continues to close remarkable deals.
Before Parallels, the company signed a similar agreement with Virtual Iron in April 2007 and with HP in June 2007.

Parallels has a chance to raise much attention with this agreement, considering the overall lower price of the solution and the possibly higher performance.
Additionally, Parallels will almost certainly extend this agreement to Parallels Server when it will be out.

3 Comments

Anonymous Virtual Guest Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:35:00 PM  
So could someone explain something with this deal? Virtuozzo virtualizes and OS, either Win 2003 or Linux, so tying up with Quest/Provision does that mean deploying W2003 server as a desktop? If that is the case who in their right mind would do it? Sure as h*ll not happening in our company!! Do Provision/Quest actually know anything about the market, as I cannot see any of my peers looking at this solution without laughing!!
Anonymous Virtual Guest 2 Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:08:00 PM  
It’s actually a pretty compelling alternative. What’s the problem with the current solutions on the market? A) Terminal Services - Great consolidation ratios - Lack isolation - Application conflicts - RDP is weak B) VDI: Provision on ESX, Hyper-V and Virtual Iron; VMware VDM; Citrix XenDesktop - Good isolation - Low consolidation ratios - Many images to manage (every VM) - Big storage requirement - RDP is weak for VDM - PortICA is weak – it is not the same as ICA This solution takes the best of TS (density) and the best of VDI (isolation) and eliminates all the negatives (single OS, single application install, less storage, better RDP implementation etc.). Yes you have to use Windows 2003 server as the base OS like in terminal server but to the user it looks like an XP desktop. It may not be for everyone. It’s an alternative – a good one – I like it.
Anonymous Steve Thursday, July 03, 2008 7:42:00 PM  
Ha - I wonder who 'Virtual Guest' works for?? :)

Terminal Services and Citrix Presentation Server have been delivering Windows Server based desktops to hundreds of thousands of users for years!! this is not a new or dangerous idea... especially seeing as Server 2008 and Vista are identical kernels now.

Add New Comment