VMware executives started blogging

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Monday, April 03, 2006   |   1 Comments
Following Steve Herrold example, Diane Greene, VMware President, and several other company executives started blogging since today. On the Greene's corporate blog there are some interesting thoughts that could help reader understanding where VMware is moving or at least where VMware is looking. A real interesting sencence from today's post is related to virtualization standards:
4. Benchmarks. There are starting to be multiple offerings for virtualization and the customer needs a way to evaluate the performance of the different offerings on apples to apples basis. There should be a benchmark that can show the performance in real-world relevant ways and also in a way that requires as inexpensive a setup as possible.
The other new blog, The Console, will collect insights on virtualization industry as well from several other VMware executives. The first post is from Dan Chu, Senior Director Developer and ISV Products and Technology Alliances, which speaks about virtual appliances, referencing virtualization.info for the insight about VMware strategy: The long chess game of VMware (thank you!). This is a great move to provide customers a deeper insight of what is VMware and what the company is trying to do. But bloggers shoud to be very careful in not sending out posts that are just a reprise of press announcements: readers expect from a corporate blog new and unique contents nobody else could provide, not a remark of what they already read on the press feed.

1 Comments

Anonymous Fraser Campbell Tuesday, April 04, 2006 1:59:00 AM  
This is indeed an interesting comment!

Publication of benchmarks would be very useful. Real, explicitly detailed benchmarks that can be used as a basis for direct comparison and easily reproduced are key in my mind.

I have done some very interesting benchmarks of ESX versus Xen but as far as I understand VMWare ESX forbids publication of benchmarks.

It is quite possible that if I was allowed to publish benchmarks then someone might see a flaw in my testing or a sub-optimal configuration that I might have chosen - and I'm not suggesting that only ESX has performance issues.

An environment freely accepting of benchmark publications could rapidly see the dissemination of best practices documentation and recommendations as flaws in the various benchmarks are exposed. This should lead to improved user experience and product satisfaction, no doubt things VMWare would appreciate.

If Diane is seriously interested in showing customers real-world relevant performance via benchmarks then the first step should be to allow open publication of benchmarks by anyone. Please correct me if I am wrong on ESX having an anti-benchmarking clause, I don't have a copy of license agreement handy at the moment.

If Diane is talking about the useless TPC-C style benchmarks where vendors throw a thousand disks at a solution to make sure it's faster than the other guy and at the same time forbidding the free and open publication of benchmarks, no thanks.

Add New Comment